On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Rayne wrote:
> Rather than just say they all suck, why not speak to the authors or
> submit issues/bug reports and explain why they suck. There is actually
> a clj-apache-http library that wraps Apache HTTP.
Which I've found to be quite good and idiomatic.
Dav
Rather than just say they all suck, why not speak to the authors or
submit issues/bug reports and explain why they suck. There is actually
a clj-apache-http library that wraps Apache HTTP.
On Aug 16, 7:36 pm, zahardzhan wrote:
> I try to use 4 http clients for Clojure. They are all suck. Use
> At
On 08/16/2010 04:12 PM, leo wrote:
I am trying to understand how efficient it would be to use Clojure to
develop an asynchronous http client for my webapp instead of using
Java. Is there any specific way one can be better than the other?
Bradford Cross of FlightCaster just wrote an excellent ar
I try to use 4 http clients for Clojure. They are all suck. Use
Atpache Commons HTTP Client - it is best choice.
On Aug 17, 8:12 am, leo wrote:
> I am trying to understand how efficient it would be to use Clojure to
> develop an asynchronous http client for my webapp instead of using
> Java. Is
You might be interested in this library:
http://github.com/neotyk/ahc-clj
It's a clojure layer on top of some nice Java libs for doing
asynchronous HTTP.
-Jeff
On Aug 16, 11:12 pm, leo wrote:
> I am trying to understand how efficient it would be to use Clojure to
> develop an asynchronous http
