On Aug 25, 11:28 am, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 16:24, Licenser wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> > JSON. In the past I've found that JSON is much cleaner to read, and
> > much easier to represent data str
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 16:24, Licenser wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON. In the past I've found that JSON is much cleaner to read, and
> much easier to represent data structures in. I know XML is a buzzword,
> but JSON is on it's
> Hi everyone,
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON.
>
> …
>
> Or do I miss something that makes it important for Clojure to be
> bundled so tightly with XML?
Where did you get the idea that Clojure is tightly bundled with XML?
It uses XML for the build sc
Hi,
On Aug 25, 4:24 pm, Licenser wrote:
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON. In the past I've found that JSON is much cleaner to read, and
> much easier to represent data structures in. I know XML is a buzzword,
> but JSON is on it's way to become one too
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Licenser wrote:
>
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON.
I don't think Clojure has standardized in any way on XML. There just happens
to be an XML parsing lib in Clojure proper because it's a useful thing to
have. There is
