@Alex, I am using 1.6.0. Transducers is something i wanna try out.
@Andy, I wasn't aware of YourKit. I have been using JProfiler and VisualVM.
I liked it, seems smoother than the other two.
Alex
On Monday, November 17, 2014 8:31:25 PM UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> What version of Clojure are yo
What version of Clojure are you using?
This seems like a use case where transducers could help significantly in
avoiding lazy effects and intermediate objects.
On Monday, November 17, 2014 4:28:12 AM UTC-6, Alexander L. wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I understand that the following question is a long s
Your description doesn't raise any particular issues in my mind, other than
a suggestion to try a JVM profiler to see if it helps you find anything,
e.g. free trial of YourKit.
Andy
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Alexander L.
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I understand that the following question is a
Thanks for the input Jozef.
I just want to clarify that I am not doing any nested reduce calls within
my code.
Alex
On Monday, November 17, 2014 1:00:43 PM UTC+2, Jozef Wagner wrote:
>
> I would look for unncessary object creation inside reduction function (use
> transients) and lazy seq reali
I would look for unncessary object creation inside reduction function (use
transients) and lazy seq realization (realize only what you really need).
Calling reduce inside reduce (inside reduce...) may easily make the
complexity of your code exponential. Consider caching of intermediate
results if t
