Re: Validation Benchmark

2016-04-19 Thread Jason Wolfe
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Atamert Ölçgen wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Thank you for the PR. I've just merged it. > > For now I have added this to the blog post: > > Results below and the comments about Schema being slow is no longer true. > See this pull request for the results Jason got with qu

Re: Validation Benchmark

2016-04-19 Thread Atamert Ölçgen
Hi Jason, Thank you for the PR. I've just merged it. For now I have added this to the blog post: Results below and the comments about Schema being slow is no longer true. See this pull request for the results Jason got with quick mode benchm

Re: Validation Benchmark

2016-04-18 Thread Jason Wolfe
Thanks for putting this together! For schema, I think using `s/validate` is not a fair comparison with the other libraries -- as you mention, it throws an exception on error, and it also has to parse the schema each time. I think `s/checker` is the correct construct to use here -- it return