Hey guys,
The major problem was the (.name unit). Changed to (:name unit) and got the
speed back. Still not very much faster than maps, but at least not so slow.
Thank you for the info :)
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 9:00:37 PM UTC, Mike Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Sorry. That was a typo. I meant
Sorry. That was a typo. I meant 1.8.
I'm just referring to the version tagged on the Jira.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated -
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 3:30:08 PM UTC-5, Mike Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Another thing to note is if you were using these maps as keys to a
> hash-based associative structure, like a hash map, then you be aware that
> Clojure record do not cache their hash code like other Clojure persistent
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-6, Fluid Dynamics wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 1:59:49 PM UTC-5, Marshall
> Bockrath-Vandegrift wrote:
>>
>> At the very least, all the places where you switched to method/property
>> syntax now require runtime reflection. Try lea
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 1:59:49 PM UTC-5, Marshall
Bockrath-Vandegrift wrote:
>
> At the very least, all the places where you switched to method/property
> syntax now require runtime reflection. Try leaving those as they were, or
> switching to using the keyword as the function (which
At the very least, all the places where you switched to method/property
syntax now require runtime reflection. Try leaving those as they were, or
switching to using the keyword as the function (which is somewhat more
idiomatic). You could instead hint the appropriate object type in each
functi
