On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Updated patch attached, the extra let for readability looked ugly to
> me after some sleep.
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 1, 2:57 pm, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Updated patch attached, the extra let for readability looked ugly to
me after some sleep.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.c
Patch with requested changes attached. Also fixed a bug, the error
message now correctly refers to the class used to initiate the field
search.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To
Rich,
Will make the change and resubmit tonight or tomorrow night. Having
computer issues this evening.
-Matt
On Dec 1, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2:57 pm, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, this again. Now that we have AOT, I wa
On Dec 1, 2:57 pm, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this again. Now that we have AOT, I wanted to revisit supporting
> the exposing of inherited protected fields that originate from farther
> up the hierarchy chain than the super class.
>
> Attached is a patch against SVN revision
