Ok. Thank you. Not quite what I was expecting but nice to see that tool too.
On Friday, 29 April 2016 20:45:27 UTC+2, Michael Willis wrote:
>
> The convention that I've seen among the Clojure community is to represent
> these kinds of things as data structures, and define your contraints using
The convention that I've seen among the Clojure community is to represent
these kinds of things as data structures, and define your contraints using
something like https://github.com/plumatic/schema
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 1:10:29 PM UTC-5, Olek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Clojure data structures ca
