Seems to work fine in my tests as long as I fully qualify it in the fn
macro that uses it. What am I missing?
If someone :uses or :refer-alls the ns, I'm assuming bad thing would
happen, but I'm not worried about that.
Dave
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
> On Thu, Au
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
> In the Clojure case, this will consist of a namespace, probably
> rx.lang.clojure, with the following helpers:
>
> (defn fn* [f]) Takes a function f, and wraps it in an object that
> implements all the various Rx FuncX interfaces
>
Erm, the
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback on your RxJava usage. I'm glad to hear that
neither of you feel too strongly about direct IFn support because...
In an effort to simplify the implementation and improve the RxJava
experience for all JVM-based languages, we'll be dropping direct IFn
support (and Groovy
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 6:03:29 PM UTC+2, daveray wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm writing to see if there's anyone out there using RxJava [1] from
> Clojure and to get their opinion on it's current, built-in support for
> non-Java languages.
>
> Just to recap, the current implementation knows about cl
On 8/27/13 10:03 AM, Dave Ray wrote:
Hi.
I'm writing to see if there's anyone out there using RxJava [1] from
Clojure and to get their opinion on it's current, built-in support for
non-Java languages.
Just to recap, the current implementation knows about clojure.lang.IFn
allowing functions
