Re: Roadmap for 2010

2009-12-29 Thread Michel Vollebregt
When I was trying to interoperate with Java libraries, I really missed annotations. Not that Lisp really needs annotations. But to interoperate with Java, you do sometimes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send em

Re: Roadmap for 2010

2009-12-28 Thread Sean Devlin
Search the mailing list for swear words. That should be a start :) On Dec 28, 7:04 pm, Jules wrote: > > the issues faced by Clojure users. > > Is there a list somewhere? > > Jules > > On Dec 28, 8:07 pm, Rich Hickey wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, ashishwave wrote: > > > Req

Re: Roadmap for 2010

2009-12-28 Thread Jules
> the issues faced by Clojure users. Is there a list somewhere? Jules On Dec 28, 8:07 pm, Rich Hickey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, ashishwave wrote: > > Request for prioritizing the 2010 roadmap. New year is just few days > > ahead :-) > > I don't like to publish roadmaps, as oft

Re: Roadmap for 2010

2009-12-28 Thread Rich Hickey
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, ashishwave wrote: > Request for prioritizing the 2010 roadmap. New year is just few days > ahead :-) > I don't like to publish roadmaps, as often the best features in any particular year wouldn't have been on the roadmap for that year. > What should be the new

Re: Roadmap for 2010

2009-12-16 Thread David Nolen
Well 1.1 is just around the corner. And 1.2 will probably bring all the deftype/defprotocol goodness. I imagine that Clojure-in-Clojure will be one of the big projects for 2010. You should check out http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/ for more info. David On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, as