On Apr 1, 11:41 am, Chanwoo Yoo wrote:
> Hello. Yesterday, I talked with a representative of a publisher about
> a translation of Lisp books. There are books about Ruby, Lua, Erlang,
> and Groovy in South Korea, but there is no book about Lisp except
> SICP. So he is considering printing the fi
I have used Java and Jsp for many years as the platform for my
business offerings. All new development is now being done in Clojure -
I am comfortable (nay, delighted) with it's stability and viability.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:51:49 Jo
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:51:49 Joshua Fox wrote:
> > 3. Clojure can use Java libraries. Common Lisp can use C/C++
> > libraries. Is it possible to say Clojure has strong points to Common
> > Lisp in the power of libraries?
>
> Accessing Java from Clojure is easier & more transparent than acce
> 3. Clojure can use Java libraries. Common Lisp can use C/C++
> libraries. Is it possible to say Clojure has strong points to Common
> Lisp in the power of libraries?
Accessing Java from Clojure is easier & more transparent than accessing C
from Common Lisp.
Joshua
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:41 PM
I can't give you any numbers on #2, but I have used both languages and there
is no comparison. Groovy is freakishly slow. Clojure is relatively zippy.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Chanwoo Yoo wrote:
>
> Hello. Yesterday, I talked with a representative of a publisher about
> a translation o
