On Dec 6, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Herwig Hochleitner
> wrote:
>> 2011/12/6 Sean Corfield :
>>> So the question is probably: why is ClojureQL assuming all generated
>>> keys are integers?
>> It shouldn't, and doesn't now:
>> https://github.com/Lau
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Herwig Hochleitner
wrote:
> 2011/12/6 Sean Corfield :
>> So the question is probably: why is ClojureQL assuming all generated
>> keys are integers?
> It shouldn't, and doesn't now:
> https://github.com/LauJensen/clojureql/commit/f7ffe88b166e6f60eccb3b4f46b7db5d69dbc
2011/12/6 Sean Corfield :
> If it helps someone debug this for Don (since he and I discussed this
> off-list):
>
> The stack trace from ClojureQL originates in its function to return
> generated keys and it's calling .getInt on the (generated) key which
> fails because it's a UUID.
>
> So the ques
If it helps someone debug this for Don (since he and I discussed this off-list):
The stack trace from ClojureQL originates in its function to return
generated keys and it's calling .getInt on the (generated) key which
fails because it's a UUID.
So the question is probably: why is ClojureQL assumi