Thanks!
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:49 AM Alan Thompson wrote:
> Jira CLJ-2508 created.
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:51 AM Alex Miller wrote:
> >
> > Actually, reporting the Clojure AND Java version would be even better.
> >
> > > On May 8, 2019, at 6:31 AM, Alex Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > I woul
Jira CLJ-2508 created.
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:51 AM Alex Miller wrote:
>
> Actually, reporting the Clojure AND Java version would be even better.
>
> > On May 8, 2019, at 6:31 AM, Alex Miller wrote:
> >
> > I would echo the other comments here. What user question are we trying to
> > answer?
Actually, reporting the Clojure AND Java version would be even better.
> On May 8, 2019, at 6:31 AM, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> I would echo the other comments here. What user question are we trying to
> answer? The scripts are not written in Clojure, but use a Clojure program to
> compute the cla
Just as an example of how other language manage that difference between
REPL and the Interpreter: Ruby...
$ irb -v
irb 0.9.6(09/06/30)
$ ruby -v
ruby 2.1.3p242 (2014-09-19 revision 47630) [x86_64-linux]
El mié., 8 may. 2019 a las 0:48, escribió:
> Or just type:
>
>
>
> cloj
Or just type: clojureor: clj And it announces the version and starts a REPL – which is documented usage. I think one of the “issues” here is that clojure / clj are scripts that have an inherent version behind them (clojure -Sdescribe) but the version of Clojure that they
