Hi Antony,
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
> On 10/04/2010, at 12:24 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
>
>> Your building/installation instructions are a bit on the terse side,
>> and left this Maven newbie in trial-and-error-land. :)
>
> I haven't written any instructions, but ye
On 10/04/2010, at 12:24 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> Your building/installation instructions are a bit on the terse side,
> and left this Maven newbie in trial-and-error-land. :)
I haven't written any instructions, but yes, the instructions on the project
aren't extensive. And the documentation
Hi Antony,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
> I've just pushed a major update to the Clojure support in pmaven to
> http://github.com/sonatype/polyglot-maven. It now covers 100% of
> maven by reflecting over the maven object model. Examples are in the
> tests and in the read
Thanks for your response. Since that's already more than I can chew
I'll stick to regular pom files as I try to follow your directions and
look through docs and samples.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Armando Blancas
wrote:
>> Looks cool. This should help the XML-allergic :)
>
> Though I don't like it, the XML is the least of my problems. Don't
> know what to do or even where to start. I want to do the following in
> maven or pmaven, but anything beyond their Hel
> Looks cool. This should help the XML-allergic :)
Though I don't like it, the XML is the least of my problems. Don't
know what to do or even where to start. I want to do the following in
maven or pmaven, but anything beyond their Hello World example has
been a real struggle :-(Any pointers?
On 08/04/2010, at 9:09 PM, Jarkko Oranen wrote:
>
>> Hopefully you can see that this syntax falls out of the direct construction
>> of maven Model object, unmediated by intermediate syntax or data
>> structuring. So there's a good reason for the way it looks.
>>
>
> Right. Thanks for the tho
> Hopefully you can see that this syntax falls out of the direct construction
> of maven Model object, unmediated by intermediate syntax or data structuring.
> So there's a good reason for the way it looks.
>
Right. Thanks for the thorough explanation. It's not so bad if you
quote the vectors i
On 08/04/2010, at 5:45 PM, Jarkko Oranen wrote:
> Looks cool. This should help the XML-allergic :)
>
> Though, is there a reason why all symbol arguments to defmodel have to
> be quoted? It looks rather unpleasant. Seems like you should be able
> to fix that by changing the body of defmaven to
>
Looks cool. This should help the XML-allergic :)
Though, is there a reason why all symbol arguments to defmodel have to
be quoted? It looks rather unpleasant. Seems like you should be able
to fix that by changing the body of defmaven to
`(reset! *MODEL* (Model ~@(for [a args] `(quote ~a
Ano
10 matches
Mail list logo
