Sounds fantastic!
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 4:13:53 PM UTC-5, Jim Crossley wrote:
>
> Sounds good, Dmitri. I'll work up something on a fork in the next few
> days and ping you. We can go from there.
>
> Jim
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Dmitri > wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > I'm
Sounds good, Dmitri. I'll work up something on a fork in the next few
days and ping you. We can go from there.
Jim
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Dmitri wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I'm the author of Luminus, and I'd love tow work with you to tune up the
> performance. Feel free to ping me via email
Hi Jim,
I'm the author of Luminus, and I'd love tow work with you to tune up the
performance. Feel free to ping me via email or on GitHub.
On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 8:17:13 PM UTC-5, Jim Crossley wrote:
>
> I just tried a few experiments and realized the :dispatch? option is
> broken in t
The Pedestal app is also strangely underperforming in some cases. A
Pedestal expert may want to take a look at its configuration.
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 9:40:28 PM UTC-5, g vim wrote:
>
> In the latest round of Techempower benchmarks:
>
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#secti
I just tried a few experiments and realized the :dispatch? option is broken
in the latest Immutant release. :(
This is a result of some changes we made to better support WebSockets.
We were already hoping to get a release out this week, so we'll add that to
the list of fixes.
Sorry about that,
Hi,
Luminus uses Immutant, which uses Undertow, so it should be possible
to tune the Luminus app to approach the performance of the TechEmpower
Undertow app. The relevant options to immutant.web/run [1] are
:dispatch?, :io-threads, and :worker-threads.
The Undertow app sets IO threads here [2] an