No. That's one of the improvements I would make if I get back to
working on it again.
Jim
On Mar 26, 1:37 pm, Sophie wrote:
>
> Is it aware of all Clojure structures, including maps etc?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to th
Really nice!
Is it aware of all Clojure structures, including maps etc?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient w
As well as optimizing compilers, there are many knowledge bases
available for prolog. Most people with a practical application that
needs an expert system are probably far more invested in that
knowledge base (the prolog code is a 'knowledge base') than in
anything else.
--
You received this mess
I've got to say that I'm not a logic programming guru. Mostly I just
see the promise there. The observation about graph search came from
the book "Simply Logical" that I linked to at the end, I believe. I
certainly didn't originate it.
If you check out Oleg's page, you'll find a lot of papers abou
On 23.03.2010, at 18:26, Quzanti wrote:
> I say that because my first thought is if you could build a logic
> language on top of LISP then would prolog be needed as the other AI
> language?
Why do we need the hundreds of programming languages we have? We don't. It's
just that different people ha
Very interesting write up.
What advantages would prolog have over such a language. Or if we are
trying to move beyond language wars - what styles of logic programming
would be more natural in either one or the other?
I say that because my first thought is if you could build a logic
language on to
