Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-05-02 Thread Sean Corfield
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Larry Travis wrote: > I now can't get the behavior to reproduce either.  I have no idea what kind > of dumb mistake I was making in the first place, and I'm very sorry to have > wasted your time. (For what it's worth, both dependency-vector versions work > in my rep

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-05-02 Thread Larry Travis
Phil: I now can't get the behavior to reproduce either. I have no idea what kind of dumb mistake I was making in the first place, and I'm very sorry to have wasted your time. (For what it's worth, both dependency-vector versions work in my reproduction attempts -- but you probably already kne

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-05-01 Thread Phil Hagelberg
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Larry Travis wrote: > Phil, Neale, Sean: > You guys are all way ahead of me as to why I am getting the results I am > getting, but it is only Neale's advice that works.  That is > > [prjctOne/prjctOne "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT"]   works, but > > > [prjctOne "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT"]

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-30 Thread Larry Travis
Phil, Neale, Sean: You guys are all way ahead of me as to why I am getting the results I am getting, but it is only Neale's advice that works. That is [prjctOne/prjctOne "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT"] works, but [prjctOne "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT"] does not. --Larry On 4/30/12 11:14 AM, Phil Hagelberg wro

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-30 Thread Phil Hagelberg
Neale Swinnerton writes: > So you need... > > [prjctOne/prjctOne "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT"] Actually this is incorrect; you never need to specify the group ID if it's the same as the artifact ID. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To pos

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-28 Thread Larry Travis
Neale: Indeed, that's exactly the dependency vector I needed. I'm impressed by your expertise. Thanks very much to both you and Sean. --Larry On 4/28/12 7:01 PM, Neale Swinnerton wrote: leiningen relies on maven dependency resolution... the dependency entry is of the form [groupId/artifa

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-28 Thread Neale Swinnerton
leiningen relies on maven dependency resolution... the dependency entry is of the form [groupId/artifactId "version"] You have the groupId and the artifactId both set to prjctOne. You can tell this from the path it's installed into your local repo. I believe this is default behaviour if you spec

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-28 Thread Larry Travis
Sean: Your suggestion doesn't work. The Slime REPL comes up fine when I use the dependency vector you suggest (some of the vectors I have tried prevent the Swank server from starting), but the REPL doesn't know anything about the functions defined in prjctOne or about the name-space in which

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-28 Thread Sean Corfield
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Larry Travis wrote: > Created /Users/larrytravis/prjctOne/prjctOne-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ... > prjctOne.  That is, what would correspond to the [utilities > "0.0.1-SNAPSHOT"] vector in your example? Try [prjctOne "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT"] -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEA

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-28 Thread Larry Travis
Sean, Your advice makes good sense, but I can't make it work. Per that advice, I paste some of my function definitions into the core.clj file of the project "prjctOne" and proceed thusly: larrytravis$ lein install Copying 1 file to /Users/larrytravis/prjctOne/lib No namespaces to :aot compile

Re: Leiningen-noobie question

2012-04-28 Thread Sean Corfield
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Larry Travis wrote: > I have installed Leiningen not so much to manage projects but to enable use > of clojure-jack-in as a means of getting Swank and Slime to work.  And they > do work for me.  But now I have a question that I can't find an answer for > in any  L