Re: Interesting challenge

2011-01-01 Thread Mark Engelberg
Thanks everyone! I'll go post my findings to the Qilang google group. I'll try to moderate the smugness I'm feeling right now :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that

Re: Interesting challenge

2011-01-01 Thread Matjaz Gregoric
According to my tests your squares both satisfy the conditions and are isomorphically unique. - Matjaz On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:03 AM, David Nolen > wrote: > > From the Qi mailing list: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/qilang/browse_

Re: Interesting challenge

2011-01-01 Thread Ken Wesson
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Michael Wood wrote: > I'm not sure how best to test that they are unique wrt. isomorphism. (= (* 8 (count squares-seq)) (count (distinct (flatten (map generate-isomorphs squares-seq), of course. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Interesting challenge

2011-01-01 Thread Michael Wood
On 1 January 2011 13:53, Mark Engelberg wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:03 AM, David Nolen wrote: >> From the Qi mailing list: >> http://groups.google.com/group/qilang/browse_thread/thread/e4a2f534fad5032a >> "I contend that this kind of problem cannot be solved (efficiently) in any >> pure fu

Re: Interesting challenge

2011-01-01 Thread Mark Engelberg
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:03 AM, David Nolen wrote: > From the Qi mailing list: > http://groups.google.com/group/qilang/browse_thread/thread/e4a2f534fad5032a > "I contend that this kind of problem cannot be solved (efficiently) in any > pure functional programming language. You may disagree" > :D

Re: Interesting challenge

2010-12-30 Thread Mike Meyer
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:03:14 -0500 David Nolen wrote: > From the Qi mailing list: > > http://groups.google.com/group/qilang/browse_thread/thread/e4a2f534fad5032a > > "I contend that this kind of problem cannot be solved (efficiently) in any > pure functional programming language. You may disagr