Re: Implicit style streams in Clojure

2010-02-08 Thread Brenton
letfn is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you. On Feb 8, 12:15 pm, Michał Marczyk wrote: > Use let: > > (defn foo [...] >   (let [helper (fn [...] ...)] >     (helper ...))) > > or letfn: > > (defn foo [...] >   (letfn [(helper [...] ...)] >     (helper ...))) > > The latter allows you to i

Re: Implicit style streams in Clojure

2010-02-08 Thread Kevin Downey
don't use def inside functions, ever. in scheme define is lexically scoped, so you do that sort of thing. clojure is not scheme. if you want a lexically scoped function use a lexical scoping construct like let or letfn. On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Brenton wrote: > What is the Clojure best p

Re: Implicit style streams in Clojure

2010-02-08 Thread Michał Marczyk
Use let: (defn foo [...] (let [helper (fn [...] ...)] (helper ...))) or letfn: (defn foo [...] (letfn [(helper [...] ...)] (helper ...))) The latter allows you to introduce mutually recursive functions. Sincerely, Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to