I know I have to do it with CLJC. I just didn't want to mess around with
too many reader conditionals.
On Saturday, 16 April 2016 19:52:30 UTC-7, tbc++ wrote:
>
> You have to do it with CLJC. Not optimal, but that's the way it goes right
> now. And yeah Associative.java is broken up into multip
You have to do it with CLJC. Not optimal, but that's the way it goes right
now. And yeah Associative.java is broken up into multiple smaller protocols
in CLJS.
Timothy
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:19 PM, JvJ wrote:
>
> I was attempting to create a cross-platform (clojure and clojurescript)
> datat
