Re: Commercially-supported, polished Clojure development environment

2010-06-25 Thread Chas Emerick
Sorry, for some reason I thought that the raw data was linked off the 'analytics' page as well -- and then I didn't notice your and Antony's messages looking for that raw data. :-( I've updated the form with a link to the raw data added: http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHVEYU

Re: Commercially-supported, polished Clojure development environment

2010-06-14 Thread Antony Blakey
On 14/06/2010, at 9:25 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote: > Hi Chas, > > I'm interested in being able to consult the detail of the answers (not > just the summary view), 'cause I guess there could be interesting > stuff in the "free form" parts of it (and the summary page just > presents a few of these an

Re: Commercially-supported, polished Clojure development environment

2010-06-14 Thread Laurent PETIT
Hi Chas, I'm interested in being able to consult the detail of the answers (not just the summary view), 'cause I guess there could be interesting stuff in the "free form" parts of it (and the summary page just presents a few of these answers). 2010/6/9 Chas Emerick : > Following the results from

Re: Commercially-supported, polished Clojure development environment

2010-06-09 Thread Matthew Elder
i think if la clojure were improved more, ie autocompletion in the repl etc that it would be very solid. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Chas Emerick wrote: > Following the results from the State of Clojure survey, and some follow-up > comments from some in #clojure indicating that they, too, wo