Re: ClojureScript One and remote development

2012-01-12 Thread Brenton
Yes. On Jan 12, 3:24 pm, Stan Dyck wrote: > On 01/12/2012 11:44 AM, Brenton wrote: > > > This can also be solved by not hard-coding "localhost" in > > one.sample.core as it is now. > > > There are functions in goog.uri.utils to help with this. > > > This is on our list of things to do. > > > Bren

Re: ClojureScript One and remote development

2012-01-12 Thread Stan Dyck
On 01/12/2012 11:44 AM, Brenton wrote: This can also be solved by not hard-coding "localhost" in one.sample.core as it is now. There are functions in goog.uri.utils to help with this. This is on our list of things to do. Brenton Is not hard-coding port 8080 also on this list? This would be

Re: ClojureScript One and remote development

2012-01-12 Thread Brenton
This can also be solved by not hard-coding "localhost" in one.sample.core as it is now. There are functions in goog.uri.utils to help with this. This is on our list of things to do. Brenton On Jan 12, 2:30 pm, Ryan Waters wrote: > I ran into an issue with remote development and ClojureScript O