David,
This compiltaion issue is still not solved. It prevents from me to upgrade
to the latest clojurescript “0.0-2268”
What is the proper channel to report this issue?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:40 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> Looks like new warnings from the Closure Compiler - something for
> co
Looks like new warnings from the Closure Compiler - something for
core.async to address. Thanks for the report!
David
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Yehonathan Sharvit wrote:
>
>
> I have compilation warnings related to core.async. Here is the log:
>
> Compiling "resources/public/js/main.js"
I have compilation warnings related to core.async. Here is the log:
Compiling "resources/public/js/main.js" from ["src/cljs"]...
Jun 10, 2014 7:49:49 AM com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager println
WARNING:
/Users/viebel/libs/klozzer/target/cljsbuild-compiler-0/cljs/core/async.js:127
That's great to hear, the feedback is much appreciated.
David
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Karsten Schmidt wrote:
> Hi David, this is great! I've switched to this branch, updated all hashing
> impls of deftypes in my library and it works without a hitch and see much
> less hash collisions in
Hi David, this is great! I've switched to this branch, updated all hashing
impls of deftypes in my library and it works without a hitch and see much
less hash collisions in large 3d meshes as a result. Awesome!
K.
On 8 Jun 2014 18:07, "David Nolen" wrote:
> 1.6.0 branch is ready to be tested
> h
1.6.0 branch is ready to be tested
http://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/tree/1.6.0, please give it a try in
your projects. You can install this version of ClojureScript by
* checking out the repo
* git checkout 1.6.0
* ./script/install
Take note of the version number that gets installed into y
I don't think we want cut such a release just yet. I think it would be more
informative to understand what's holding people off of 1.6.0.
David
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Joshua Ballanco
wrote:
> At the risk of suggesting something completely heretical…
>
> Would it be possible to declare
Given the feedback so far such a request seems to be in the minority. You
could run a separate project for the CLJS parts. That said, is there
something in the latest release (0.0-2227) that you find problematic that
you can't continue with it?
David
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Matching Socks
Can a lein-cljsbuild clj+cljs project specify separate versions of Clojure
for the cljs and clj parts?
If not, please give it another 6 months.
On Friday, June 6, 2014 10:43:42 AM UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
>
> Future releases of ClojureScript will have a hard dependency on Clojure
> 1.6.0
that’s great.
thanks Nicola
mimmo
On 06 Jun 2014, at 19:48, Nicola Mometto wrote:
>
> For that matters, I'm working on writing tools.analyzer.js and the
> minimum clojure version supported will be 1.4.0
>
> Nicola
>
>
> Chris Granger writes:
>
>> Since I doubt there'd be any others, I'll be
For that matters, I'm working on writing tools.analyzer.js and the
minimum clojure version supported will be 1.4.0
Nicola
Chris Granger writes:
> Since I doubt there'd be any others, I'll be the only dissenter ;)
>
> People already get mad Light Table requiring 1.5 since we use CLJS to do
> an
My hope is that the GSoC analyzer work will allow ClojureScript and
projects like LT to share an analyzer without the hassle of conflicting
release cycles. Any help to expedite this decoupling is of course
appreciated.
David
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Chris Granger wrote:
> Since I doubt
Since I doubt there'd be any others, I'll be the only dissenter ;)
People already get mad Light Table requiring 1.5 since we use CLJS to do
analysis and such. Bumping it up to 1.6 means it'd be a long time before we
could move our version of CLJS again. Maybe that's not a real issue and
really jus
+1
mimmo
On 06 Jun 2014, at 19:22, Andrey Antukh wrote:
> +1
>
>
> 2014-06-06 19:19 GMT+02:00 Karsten Schmidt :
> +1
>
> On 6 Jun 2014 16:59, "David Nolen" wrote:
> Clojure 1.6.0 introduced Murmur3 for much improved collection hashing and
> several new functions & macros. There's very littl
+1
2014-06-06 19:19 GMT+02:00 Karsten Schmidt :
> +1
> On 6 Jun 2014 16:59, "David Nolen" wrote:
>
>> Clojure 1.6.0 introduced Murmur3 for much improved collection hashing and
>> several new functions & macros. There's very little incentive to continue
>> to support 1.5.X given these enhancemen
+1
On 6 Jun 2014 16:59, "David Nolen" wrote:
> Clojure 1.6.0 introduced Murmur3 for much improved collection hashing and
> several new functions & macros. There's very little incentive to continue
> to support 1.5.X given these enhancements.
>
> David
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Joshua
Clojure 1.6.0 introduced Murmur3 for much improved collection hashing and
several new functions & macros. There's very little incentive to continue
to support 1.5.X given these enhancements.
David
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Joshua Ballanco
wrote:
> No objection, but I’m curious what are
17 matches
Mail list logo
