Hi,
On Aug 12, 11:43 am, Maximilian Karasz
wrote:
> May i ask what kinds of improvements are planned for connection handling?
> Do you want to move it into the direction of persistent connections /
> connection pools?
We are currently looking into ways the user might specify connections
himsel
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
Yes. run uses a one-shot connection. When you leave the body
> the connection will be closed. Hence the second form cannot
> work, because the connection is already closed. We are currently
> working on improving the connection handl
Hi,
Am 11.08.2009 um 21:59 schrieb Maximilian Karasz:
ah, thank you so much for the hint, forcing the sequence did the
trick.
out of curiousity: while the following works
(cql/run [*connection* result] (cql/query * people) (doall (take 5
result)))
this does not
(doall (cql/run [*connec
ah, thank you so much for the hint, forcing the sequence did the trick.
out of curiousity: while the following works
(cql/run [*connection* result] (cql/query * people) (doall (take 5 result)))
this does not
(doall (cql/run [*connection* result] (cql/query * people) (take 5 result)))
suggestin
It looks like (speaking without having looked at the ClojureQL source)
the results are being returned as a lazy sequence. In the first case
the sequence isn't being realized but it is in the second.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Maximilian
Karasz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i've been wanting to play wit
