On Sunday 14 December 2008 13:47, Chouser wrote:
> I've updated the Clojure classes graph (thanks for the push, R.
> Schulz!) The new version includes the newest classes as well as Java
> interfaces that are applicable. These latter are shown inside
> diamonds.
>
> ...
>
> I won't be maintaining
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Chouser wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>>
>> It seems the interface detection is not quite right - many things that
>> are interfaces are shown as classes.
>
> Yes, the legend is misleading. Diamonds are for non-clojure
> interfac
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> It seems the interface detection is not quite right - many things that
> are interfaces are shown as classes.
Yes, the legend is misleading. Diamonds are for non-clojure
interfaces, ovals are clojure.lang.* classes and interfaces.
--Chou
On Dec 15, 10:27 am, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> Cool, thanks!
> -S
>
> On Dec 14, 4:47 pm, Chouser wrote:
>
> > I've updated the Clojure classes graph (thanks for the push, R.
> > Schulz!) The new version includes the newest classes as well as Java
> > interfaces that are applicable. These latte
Cool, thanks!
-S
On Dec 14, 4:47 pm, Chouser wrote:
> I've updated the Clojure classes graph (thanks for the push, R.
> Schulz!) The new version includes the newest classes as well as Java
> interfaces that are applicable. These latter are shown inside
> diamonds.
>
> A couple different .svg a
