On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:46 AM, HB wrote:
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
Another answer is that ``it could be if you wanted it to be'', for example:
http://s-expressions.com/2009/12/10/frumios-a-silly-object-system-for-clojure/
.
--
You
On 11 February 2010 17:57, John Pall wrote:
> can we creat threads in clojure?
Yes.
Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
user=> (Thread.)
#
But often you would use an agent or pmap etc. instead of creating
explicit threads.
--
Michael Wood
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:46 AM, HB wrote:
> Hey,
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
> Thanks.
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3465
sincerely.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post
I suspect that Clojure is actually more suited to OOP than Java,
assuming you're going by Dr. Kay's definition. :)
Another Kay quote:
"I invented Object-Oriented Programming, and C++ is not what I had in
mind."
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cl
Hi,
On Feb 11, 1:46 pm, HB wrote:
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
Careful not to come to the conclusion that if something's a Lisp, it's
not OOP.
For instance, Common Lisp has a powerful OOP system which includes
multiple-inheritance, metaobject p
Instead of getting caught up in whether or not it supports OOP, and
how to define OOP, I recommend watching
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Are-We-There-Yet-Rich-Hickey.
On Feb 11, 6:46 am, HB wrote:
> Hey,
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
> Than
On 11 February 2010 13:46, HB wrote:
> Hey,
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
> Thanks.
Regardless of whether Clojure supports OOP, not supporting it
certainly doesn't follow from being a Lisp dialect. Take a look at
CLOS (Common Lisp Object System),
can we creat threads in clojure?
On Feb 11, 8:11 pm, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> The problem is about the overloading of the "object based" expression.
>
> A step forward could be to recognize that:
> * Java is a weak/simplified version of a class based language
> (simplifications made for several we
The problem is about the overloading of the "object based" expression.
A step forward could be to recognize that:
* Java is a weak/simplified version of a class based language
(simplifications made for several well known reasons: ease of adoption
by C/C++ crowd: - algol like syntax-, reduced func
Joel Westerberg wrote:
You can work with java objects. But clojure itself is not object
oriented, because it's functional, and object orientation requires state
manipulation.
By whose definition? Are you saying there is no such thing as an
immutable object?
Other lisps support object orien
You can work with java objects. But clojure itself is not object oriented,
because it's functional, and object orientation requires state manipulation.
Other lisps support object orientation, common-lisp for example.
cheers,
/J
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:46 PM, HB wrote:
> Hey,
> Since Clojure
On Feb 11, 12:46 pm, HB wrote:
> Hey,
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
> Thanks.
To quote Dr. Alan Kay:
"OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and
hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. It
can be d
On 11 February 2010 22:46, HB wrote:
> Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
> support OOP?
You might find this article interesting:
http://blog.thinkrelevance.com/2009/8/12/rifle-oriented-programming-with-clojure-2
And related:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/151785
13 matches
Mail list logo
