I think I understand what Michael mean by "bias", am I the only one with a
CA to also understand it ? :-)
Let's try again: the root problem is not about having to send CAs via
paper, pidgeon or electronically. It is how to build a process so that it
does not get in the way of as many people willin
The discussion on the clojure-dev list is not about *if* CAs will be
accepted electronically, but *how*. Stuart Halloway requested help finding
examples of the processes that other organizations have developed for
receiving contributor agreements. In particular, he wanted to know if some
large
On Oct 30, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
> 2012/10/31 Andy Fingerhut
> I don't think the idea of the discussion is to go by majority vote
>
> It's not about making decisions by majority vote, Andy. It is about
> making sure many members of the community can *participate* or even
> sim
2012/10/31 Andy Fingerhut
> I don't think the idea of the discussion is to go by majority vote
It's not about making decisions by majority vote, Andy. It is about
making sure many members of the community can *participate* or even
simple be aware of important discussions.
Most people don't fol
The concept of selection bias is only applicable when you are trying to get a
representative sample of a population.
I don't think the idea of the discussion is to go by majority vote. It is to
find a process that meets the criteria decided upon by the Clojure/core
members. I'm not one of the
