It does, thanks for the explanation. Stuart Halloway and I took a look
at this yesterday and have started on a solution. I will create a ticket
in JIRA to track it. The basic idea is that BigInts that are small
enough to store their value in the Long portion of the BigInt will not
do the extra
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:09 AM, abedra wrote:
> Can you provide a couple of concrete examples for this? I will make
> the ticket in JIRA and start working on it, but I am spread thin on
> quite a few things at the moment and these examples will help a lot.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aaron Bedra
Sure, let
Can you provide a couple of concrete examples for this? I will make
the ticket in JIRA and start working on it, but I am spread thin on
quite a few things at the moment and these examples will help a lot.
Cheers,
Aaron Bedra
--
Clojure/core
http://clojure.com
On Jun 24, 12:47 pm, Mark Engelberg
Whoops, I thought I was asking on the dev list, but autocompletion
sent it to the regular clojure list. Sorry about that. I'm resending
to the dev list.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@goo
Hi Mark,
Please see to http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Clojure+Contrib
To migrate an old clojure-contrib namespace, just ask on the clojure-dev
list.
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
>
> There is currently no plan for a Clojure 1.3-compatible release of "old"
> clojure-contrib. However, if people with commit access to "old"
> clojure-contrib have time to fix all the little things that prevent it from
> building under 1.3, I
Also see the original design page on the wiki for where things ended up.
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Contrib+Library+Names
--
Cheers,
Aaron Bedra
--
Clojure/core
http://clojure.com
On 06/24/2011 04:53 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
The monolithic "clojure-contrib" project is not being ac
It's already on the list in the ticket
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-815
On 06/24/2011 11:31 PM, Alan Malloy wrote:
What about juxt? Can we get rid of the "Alpha - name subject to
change" in the docstring there?
--
Cheers,
Aaron Bedra
--
Clojure/core
http://clojure.com
--
You receiv
What about juxt? Can we get rid of the "Alpha - name subject to
change" in the docstring there?
On Jun 24, 6:35 am, Aaron Bedra wrote:
> Everything is now beta. deftype/defrecord have had some changes
> recently, but they are ready to rock. I will update the docstrings today.
>
> Aaron
>
> On 0
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:53:13 -0400, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
So, if you are currently using Clojure 1.2, your upgrade path might look
something like this:
1. Find the "new" contrib library you need
I am wondering how best to handle current contrib functionality, such as
clojure.contrib.refl
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> The monolithic "clojure-contrib" project is not being actively maintained.
> It does not currently build on Clojure 1.3 beta. All new development is
> happening in "new" contrib libraries under http://github.com/clojure
It's probably worth p
The monolithic "clojure-contrib" project is not being actively maintained.
It does not currently build on Clojure 1.3 beta. All new development is
happening in "new" contrib libraries under http://github.com/clojure
Most of the libraries from "old" clojure-contrib have been released as "new"
co
What's the plan for a compatible version of clojure-contrib for 1.3?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Mark Engelberg
wrote:
> One of the main changes to 1.3 is that arithmetic operations on longs
> do not automatically overflow.
>
> In the early discussions of this new feature, it was pointed out
One of the main changes to 1.3 is that arithmetic operations on longs
do not automatically overflow.
In the early discussions of this new feature, it was pointed out that
people who want overflow capability can use the special "prime"
operators, but that the preferred way to do things would be to
On 06/24/2011 09:29 AM, smf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just a quick question (before I forget): Is deftype/defrecord still
alpha? Or is the "Alpha - subject to change" note in the docstrings
just an oversight?
Thanks,
-F.M.
I just created a housekeeping ticket around all of the alpha markings.
S
Everything is now beta. deftype/defrecord have had some changes
recently, but they are ready to rock. I will update the docstrings today.
Aaron
On 06/24/2011 09:29 AM, smf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just a quick question (before I forget): Is deftype/defrecord still
alpha? Or is the "Alpha - s
Just a quick question (before I forget): Is deftype/defrecord still
alpha? Or is the "Alpha - subject to change" note in the docstrings
just an oversight?
Thanks,
-F.M.
On 23 Jun., 20:43, Chris Redinger wrote:
> Clojure 1.3 Beta 1 is now available at
>
> http://clojure.org/downloads
>
> All of y
17 matches
Mail list logo