Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-08-03 Thread Aaron Bedra
It does, thanks for the explanation. Stuart Halloway and I took a look at this yesterday and have started on a solution. I will create a ticket in JIRA to track it. The basic idea is that BigInts that are small enough to store their value in the Long portion of the BigInt will not do the extra

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-07-30 Thread Mark Engelberg
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:09 AM, abedra wrote: > Can you provide a couple of concrete examples for this?  I will make > the ticket in JIRA and start working on it, but I am spread thin on > quite a few things at the moment and these examples will help a lot. > > Cheers, > > Aaron Bedra Sure, let

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-07-29 Thread abedra
Can you provide a couple of concrete examples for this? I will make the ticket in JIRA and start working on it, but I am spread thin on quite a few things at the moment and these examples will help a lot. Cheers, Aaron Bedra -- Clojure/core http://clojure.com On Jun 24, 12:47 pm, Mark Engelberg

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Engelberg
Whoops, I thought I was asking on the dev list, but autocompletion sent it to the regular clojure list. Sorry about that. I'm resending to the dev list. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@goo

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-07-10 Thread Stuart Sierra
Hi Mark, Please see to http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Clojure+Contrib To migrate an old clojure-contrib namespace, just ask on the clojure-dev list. -S -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clo

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-07-09 Thread Mark Engelberg
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > > There is currently no plan for a Clojure 1.3-compatible release of "old" > clojure-contrib. However, if people with commit access to "old" > clojure-contrib have time to fix all the little things that prevent it from > building under 1.3, I

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-25 Thread Aaron Bedra
Also see the original design page on the wiki for where things ended up. http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Contrib+Library+Names -- Cheers, Aaron Bedra -- Clojure/core http://clojure.com On 06/24/2011 04:53 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote: The monolithic "clojure-contrib" project is not being ac

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-25 Thread Aaron Bedra
It's already on the list in the ticket http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-815 On 06/24/2011 11:31 PM, Alan Malloy wrote: What about juxt? Can we get rid of the "Alpha - name subject to change" in the docstring there? -- Cheers, Aaron Bedra -- Clojure/core http://clojure.com -- You receiv

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Alan Malloy
What about juxt? Can we get rid of the "Alpha - name subject to change" in the docstring there? On Jun 24, 6:35 am, Aaron Bedra wrote: > Everything is now beta.  deftype/defrecord have had some changes > recently, but they are ready to rock.  I will update the docstrings today. > > Aaron > > On 0

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Hugo Duncan
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:53:13 -0400, Stuart Sierra wrote: So, if you are currently using Clojure 1.2, your upgrade path might look something like this: 1. Find the "new" contrib library you need I am wondering how best to handle current contrib functionality, such as clojure.contrib.refl

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Sean Corfield
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > The monolithic "clojure-contrib" project is not being actively maintained. > It does not currently build on Clojure 1.3 beta. All new development is > happening in "new" contrib libraries under http://github.com/clojure It's probably worth p

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Stuart Sierra
The monolithic "clojure-contrib" project is not being actively maintained. It does not currently build on Clojure 1.3 beta. All new development is happening in "new" contrib libraries under http://github.com/clojure Most of the libraries from "old" clojure-contrib have been released as "new" co

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
What's the plan for a compatible version of clojure-contrib for 1.3? On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > One of the main changes to 1.3 is that arithmetic operations on longs > do not automatically overflow. > > In the early discussions of this new feature, it was pointed out

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Engelberg
One of the main changes to 1.3 is that arithmetic operations on longs do not automatically overflow. In the early discussions of this new feature, it was pointed out that people who want overflow capability can use the special "prime" operators, but that the preferred way to do things would be to

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Aaron Bedra
On 06/24/2011 09:29 AM, smf...@googlemail.com wrote: Just a quick question (before I forget): Is deftype/defrecord still alpha? Or is the "Alpha - subject to change" note in the docstrings just an oversight? Thanks, -F.M. I just created a housekeeping ticket around all of the alpha markings. S

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread Aaron Bedra
Everything is now beta. deftype/defrecord have had some changes recently, but they are ready to rock. I will update the docstrings today. Aaron On 06/24/2011 09:29 AM, smf...@googlemail.com wrote: Just a quick question (before I forget): Is deftype/defrecord still alpha? Or is the "Alpha - s

Re: Clojure 1.3 Beta 1

2011-06-24 Thread smf...@googlemail.com
Just a quick question (before I forget): Is deftype/defrecord still alpha? Or is the "Alpha - subject to change" note in the docstrings just an oversight? Thanks, -F.M. On 23 Jun., 20:43, Chris Redinger wrote: > Clojure 1.3 Beta 1 is now available at > > http://clojure.org/downloads > > All of y