On 7/17/10 5:50 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
On 7/16/10 2:42 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:
Going to http:// clojure.org, searching for git and following the "Clojure goes
git" link would lead one to
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/ca4fb58428052554 which suggests that the
rickhickey pag
Hi,
Am 16.07.2010 um 20:56 schrieb Jeffrey Schwab:
> On 7/16/10 2:42 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:
>> Going to http:// clojure.org, searching for git and following the "Clojure
>> goes git" link would lead one to
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/ca4fb58428052554 which suggests
>> that t
Hi,
FWIW...
I've delayed this work for ages, but now that 1.2 is just around the
corner I have no reason to wait any longer. So I went through all [1]
examples from our forthcoming book [2] and tested them with the
current beta. The result of this is encouraging: everything works
fine.
Until n
On 7/16/10 2:42 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:
Going to http:// clojure.org, searching for git and following the "Clojure goes
git" link would lead one to
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/ca4fb58428052554 which suggests that the
rickhickey page is the right one. Where's the announcement abo
Hi Stu,
On 16 Jul., 19:54, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> The behavior you are seeing is not a problem, and understanding why may be
> helpful to using agents correctly.
>
> The thread that sends to an agent has no guarantee that it will (or will not)
> see the result of its action a t
Going to http:// clojure.org, searching for git and following the "Clojure goes
git" link would lead one to
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/ca4fb58428052554 which suggests that
the rickhickey page is the right one. Where's the announcement about
git://github.com/clojure ?
thanks,
c
Hi Stefan,
The behavior you are seeing is not a problem, and understanding why may be
helpful to using agents correctly.
The thread that sends to an agent has no guarantee that it will (or will not)
see the result of its action a tiny bit later, when the repl prints the
stringified version of
Hi,
I think I found a minor problem. It appears with the error handling
of agents and actually is just a minor glitch in the output.
Consider the following session, copied from a terminal:
shell> java -cp clojure.jar clojure.main
Clojure 1.2.0-beta1
user=> (def agt1 (agent "One"))
#'user/agt1
u
Sorry my answer was so short. I only remember that there was some kind
of problem with master.git and clojure.git. So I thought I'll give you
a tip and you will figure out the rest but your problem was bigger
then I thought.
On 15 Jul., 19:02, Jeffrey Schwab wrote:
> On 7/15/10 10:15 AM, Adrian
On 7/15/10 10:15 AM, Adrian Cuthbertson wrote:
Apparently there's a problem with git clone http://...
Should be git clone git://github.com/clojure/clojure.git
Sorry for the noise.
Thanks, I've been mistakenly working from
git://github.com/richhickey/clojure.git
...which is apparently why
On 7/15/10 9:24 AM, nickikt wrote:
the new branch is called clojure not master
Thanks, but I see no branch by that name. Do you mean 1.2.x? (And
what's the corresponding branch for clojure-contrib?)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" gro
Apparently there's a problem with git clone http://...
Should be git clone git://github.com/clojure/clojure.git
Sorry for the noise.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Adrian Cuthbertson
wrote:
> I'm trying...
> git clone http://github.com/clojure/clojure.git
> and getting the following error...
I'm trying...
git clone http://github.com/clojure/clojure.git
and getting the following error...
Getting pack 9be7389ab68fea4a8309596c2916961599d2b06c
which contains 833f9f368d2274766aa4699195b3fba3f9e4e8f0
error: Unable to get pack file
http://github.com/clojure/clojure.git/objects/pack/pack-9be
Hi,
On Jul 15, 3:24 pm, nickikt wrote:
> the new branch is called clojure not master
To be more precise: the new repo is under http://github.com/clojure
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send
the new branch is called clojure not master
On Jul 15, 3:11 pm, Jeffrey Schwab wrote:
> Is Clojure 1.2 Beta 1 built from the current clojure.git head on github?
> I don't see any 1.2 branches or tags, and the repl prints the following:
>
> Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
>
> I also don't see any
Is Clojure 1.2 Beta 1 built from the current clojure.git head on github?
I don't see any 1.2 branches or tags, and the repl prints the following:
Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
I also don't see any commits since 6/23; is that right?
Thanks and congratulations, btw. :)
On 7/14/10 11:35 AM, St
Congrats to Clojure on hitting this fantastic milestone :)
Question: the release notes mentions a new clojure.string namespace.
But I've had no luck finding it in the online API at
http://richhickey.github.com/clojure/. Am I missing something?
On Jul 14, 9:03 am, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Clojur
It will probably go on master fairly soon, but the community will need some
time with it before a release.
> I think my number crunching code would benefit immensely from
> equals/equiv code. When can we hope to see a release containing
> equals/equiv effort?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010
I think my number crunching code would benefit immensely from
equals/equiv code. When can we hope to see a release containing
equals/equiv effort?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> Later release.
>
>> I didn't see mention of the new equals/equiv work.
>> Is this g
This will be fixed in the next beta.
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets/402-degenerate-defrecords-should-act-like-empty-maps
Stu
> Report:
> There is still "call to contains can't be resolved" for defrecord.
> After googling for this message, I see that it has been discussed (and
>
Later release.
> I didn't see mention of the new equals/equiv work.
> Is this going into a later beta or is this work tentatively going into
> a later release?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send emai
I didn't see mention of the new equals/equiv work.
Is this going into a later beta or is this work tentatively going into
a later release?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
No
Report:
There is still "call to contains can't be resolved" for defrecord.
After googling for this message, I see that it has been discussed (and
can be easily fixed?).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email
Just pushed, sorry.
> Awesome! Looks great.
>
> What branch/tag of clojure-contrib is the clojure-contrib-1.2.0-
> beta1.zip download built from? I don't see it under branches, and
> master builds clojure-contrib-1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Jul 14, 10:03 am, Stuart Halloway
> wrote:
Hugely appreciated!
--
/ Peter Schuller
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubs
Awesome! Looks great.
What branch/tag of clojure-contrib is the clojure-contrib-1.2.0-
beta1.zip download built from? I don't see it under branches, and
master builds clojure-contrib-1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Thanks.
On Jul 14, 10:03 am, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> Clojure 1.2 Beta 1 is now available, a
Congrats! It's an incredible update.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Clojure 1.2 Beta 1 is now available, along with a corresponding Clojure
> Contrib, at:
>
>http://clojure.org/downloads
>
> It contains significant new features, as well as many bug fixes and s
Congrats!
On Jul 14, 11:03 am, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> Clojure 1.2 Beta 1 is now available, along with a corresponding Clojure
> Contrib, at:
>
> http://clojure.org/downloads
>
> It contains significant new features, as well as many bug fixes and small
> enhancements. A larger number of
28 matches
Mail list logo
