On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Jan Rychter wrote:
>
> Tassilo Horn writes:
> [...]
> > BTW: What's the reason that Clojure is licensed under the EPL and the
> > contrib stuff under CPL? Since clojure is not really eclipse-related, I
> > don't see a good rationale. IMHO, the Lesser GPL would
Tassilo Horn writes:
[...]
> BTW: What's the reason that Clojure is licensed under the EPL and the
> contrib stuff under CPL? Since clojure is not really eclipse-related, I
> don't see a good rationale. IMHO, the Lesser GPL would be a much better
> fit. Then you can use clojure also in commerc
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> This has been discussed as nauseam before:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/6e99caafcf2bbedf/b5519cc219a5baeb
>
> Nothing has changed, so let's give it a rest, please.
This may be a tempest in a tea-pot, at l
Tassilo Horn writes:
>> But actually I believe the status quo is already quite permissive.
>> The fact that Clojure is EPLed doesn't mean you can't write GPLed apps
>> using it.* The EPL-GPL incompatibility bites you only when you try to
>> GPL something that is a "derivative work" of Clojure.
>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> This has been discussed as nauseam before:
Ah, so it has. Fair enough.
>
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/6e99caafcf2bbedf/b5519cc219a5baeb
>
> Nothing has changed, so let's give it a rest, please.
>
> Ric
This has been discussed as nauseam before:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/6e99caafcf2bbedf/b5519cc219a5baeb
Nothing has changed, so let's give it a rest, please.
Rich
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:11 AM, John Harrop wrote:
> This is a problem.
> The GPL is a very popular
This is a problem.
The GPL is a very popular open source license. If a language does not permit
developers to use the GPL, that language may be severely reducing the number
of developers willing to adopt it.
It would be desirable for clojure.lang and clojure.core to use a modified
license, somethi
On Aug 28, 4:18 pm, Matthias Benkard wrote:
> On 28 Aug., 13:42, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>
> > I have a licensing question. Am I allowed to include clojure.jar in a
> > GPL project?
>
> IANAL, but if I understand the GPL correctly, it prohibits you from
> distributing a GPL-covered programme that
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Garth Sheldon-Coulson wrote:
> Another option Rich could consider for Clojure is the Mozilla tri-license
> (GPL/LGPL/MPL).
>
> http://www-archive.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html
>
> The tri-license would remove any lingering ambiguity about building GPLed
> Cl
Garth Sheldon-Coulson writes:
Hi Garth,
> Another option Rich could consider for Clojure is the Mozilla
> tri-license (GPL/LGPL/MPL).
>
> http://www-archive.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html
>
> The tri-license would remove any lingering ambiguity about building
> GPLed Clojure projects.
Wh
Another option Rich could consider for Clojure is the Mozilla tri-license
(GPL/LGPL/MPL).
http://www-archive.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html
The tri-license would remove any lingering ambiguity about building GPLed
Clojure projects.
But actually I believe the status quo is already quite per
Meikel Brandmeyer writes:
Hi!
>> perhaps this link in the FAQ for the EPL will clear things up.
>>
>> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#USEINANOTHER
>
> Wow! All but one of my Clojure projects are illegal! (They are all MIT
> licensed...)
Yep, but I think this doesn't apply. We wouldn't
Meikel, the situation is certainly not as bad as you think.
What the "USEINANOTHER" url link states (as far as I understand) is for
people for take the source coce, and RELICENSE it, changing the header and
pretending that from the fork point it can be handled by another license.
This indeed seems
Hi,
Am 29.08.2009 um 00:58 schrieb Daniel Renfer:
perhaps this link in the FAQ for the EPL will clear things up.
http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#USEINANOTHER
Wow! All but one of my Clojure projects are illegal! (They are all MIT
licensed...)
But I hope, that this link doesn't app
perhaps this link in the FAQ for the EPL will clear things up.
http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#USEINANOTHER
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>
> Matthias Benkard writes:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
>> On 28 Aug., 13:42, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>>> I have a licensing question. Am
Matthias Benkard writes:
Hi Matthias,
> On 28 Aug., 13:42, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>> I have a licensing question. Am I allowed to include clojure.jar in a
>> GPL project?
>
> IANAL, but if I understand the GPL correctly, it prohibits you from
> distributing a GPL-covered programme that is based o
On 28 Aug., 13:42, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> I have a licensing question. Am I allowed to include clojure.jar in a
> GPL project?
IANAL, but if I understand the GPL correctly, it prohibits you from
distributing a GPL-covered programme that is based on Clojure, because
it would need to be linked to
17 matches
Mail list logo
