On Sunday, August 24, 2014 9:43:41 AM UTC-5, Ashton Kemerling wrote:
>
> Just remember that Clisp
>
> 1) not entirely immutable
> 2) not a hosted language
>
> I worked in CL professionally for a year (SBCL in particular) and while
> clojure is closer to SBCL than it is to python, it is a differen
Are people using "Clisp" to refer to Common Lisp these days? I always
spell the whole thing out, or use "CL" when context makes it sufficiently
clear. I think of "CLISP" as the name for one particular CL implementation.
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 9:43:41 AM UTC-5, Ashton Kemerling wrote:
>
> J
Just remember that ClispÂ
1) not entirely immutable
2) not a hosted language
I worked in CL professionally for a year (SBCL in particular) and while clojure
is closer to SBCL than it is to python, it is a different beast. CL is a more
complicated language, with a long past and odd specs co
Practical Common Lisp will definitely help understanding Clojure, too. For
example, the way, Macros are introduced and used, and understanding generic
functions.
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/
stefan
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 12:49:07 PM UTC+2, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> There are a lot of
