Thanks, I haven't used pre and post conditions before but this seems like a
good place to start.
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 8:17:53 PM UTC-4, James Reeves wrote:
>
> If you're representing a matrix with vectors, then any public function
> that operates on a matrix should return vectors.
>
> You ma
If you're representing a matrix with vectors, then any public function that
operates on a matrix should return vectors.
You may want to consider a function like:
(defn matrix? [m]
(and (vector? m)
(every? vector m)
(apply = (count m) (map count m)))
Then add it as a pre and post
This works for all cases were I transform the matrix using map, but I also
transform it using reverse and assoc.
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 8:02:03 PM UTC-4, Jason Ozias wrote:
>
> Take a look at mapv. If you aren't dealing with lazy sequence, it'll map
> the function across and convert the outpu
Take a look at mapv. If you aren't dealing with lazy sequence, it'll map
the function across and convert the output to a vector.
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 7:28:47 PM UTC-4, Joseph Rollins wrote:
>
> I am confused about the best way to assure that I am dealing with a vector
> when dealing with co
