Yep. `macro-let` is what you're looking for.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
> Take a look at tools.macro/macrolet.
>
> https://github.com/clojure/tools.macro/
>
> Regards,
> BG
>
> Sent from phone. Please excuse brevity.
> On 6 Nov 2012 19:10, "Sean Neilan" wrote:
>
>
Take a look at tools.macro/macrolet.
https://github.com/clojure/tools.macro/
Regards,
BG
Sent from phone. Please excuse brevity.
On 6 Nov 2012 19:10, "Sean Neilan" wrote:
> I was hoping to write a macro inside of a let statement. The macro would
> be returned from the let and keep closures to
Well, logically the difference between a function and macro is just that
the parameters will be evaluated in a function call but will not in a macro
call. I suppose you can use anonymous function to achieve what you may want
in a LET statement.
And as SunNing said, Clojure will use meta tag ":
I was hoping to write a macro inside of a let statement. The macro would be
returned from the let and keep closures to whatever was defined in the let.
Also, if possible, define multiple global macros inside of a let statement
so it's as if the let is returning multiple values.
On Tue, Nov 6, 201
I was hoping to write a macro inside of a let statement. The macro would be
returned from the let and keep closures to whatever was defined in the let.
Also, if possible, define multiple global macros inside of a let statement
so it's as if the let is returning multiple values.
On Tue, Nov 6, 20
May I know in what circumstances would an anonymous macro be applied? - I
just don't think there's a way to define anonymous macro but maybe we can
make a workaround by manipulating the macro syntax...
在 2012年11月7日星期三UTC+8上午8时17分37秒，Sean Neilan写道：
>
> Is there any way to write an anonymous macro
I'm afraid not. Macro should be bound on a var. The clojure compile
checks an attribute (isMacro) on a var to determine if it's a macro or
function.
And Since a macro has no value, you cannot write it with some literals.
On Wed 07 Nov 2012 08:16:42 AM CST, Sean Neilan wrote:
Is there any way t
