> You're calling my bluff, eh? Well, no I don't yet.
Although I have been known to do some bluff-calling, in this case I
was actually hoping you had done it because I need this for a project
I'm working on. :-)
> I think the problem with your example is trying to work with classes
> or namespac
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Greg Harman wrote:
>
> Do you have an example of gen-interface + proxy working together?
You're calling my bluff, eh? Well, no I don't yet. I'm doing ugly
hacky things instead, to avoid the compile step. But since you've
thrown down the gauntlet, to mix some me
Chouser,
Do you have an example of gen-interface + proxy working together? Take
a look at the following. Proxy works fine for a Java-provided
interface, but not for the generated one (ICompileTest.class is being
generated and is in the filesystem/classpath where expected.)
(ns compiletest)
(gen-
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
>
> 1) This use case may be obscure enough that I should just buckle down
> and give (ns (:gen-class ...)) some love.
It may be, but let me again mention the option of gen-interface plus
proxy. Sometimes you need to produce a physical .class
Chris.
Yes, my current implementation is as we discussed (I use a vector
instead of a map, but that's a nit) and it works great as long as I
control the object and can pull out their component parts when I need
to. However, when I pass it other places that may not understand what
I have, it gets
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
>
> (This is sort of a follow-up to this thread from last July:
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/7f5cf3e78954b81d/aae7f082c51337c9?lnk=gst&q=proxy#aae7f082c51337c9.)
>
> Recently, I've been building a version of jav
Oops, sorry about the wrapping!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+uns
