On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Chanwoo Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for your kind exaplanation. :) To a newbie like me, list and
> vector seemed that they have no significant difference.
No problem, I think everyone runs into these kinds of issues when they
first look at Clojure. H
Thanks! Now I'm simply looking into *inferior lisp* buffer.
Strangely, still next code seems not working in slime...
(binding [*test-out* System/out]
(run-tests))
On 11월3일, 오후11시34분, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 11:20 pm, Chanwoo Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> Hmm, not sure. I don't use SLIME, but I know that run-tests prints
> results to *test-out*, which by default is bound to
> java.lang.System.err. You could try re-binding *test-out* to standard
> output like this:
>
> (binding [*test-out* System
> I have one more trivial question. It seems good that Clojure
> consistently manages all data structures as sequence. But operator
> like 'assoc' can be applied to map and vector, except list and string.
> I'm curious about the reason of this decision.
What would (assoc (list 1 2 3) x y) mean? W
On Nov 2, 11:20 pm, Chanwoo Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I evaluate (run-tests) in a repl of my terminal, I can see test
> messages. But when I do it in slime, I can't see any messages. How I
> can see test results in slime?
Hmm, not sure. I don't use SLIME, but I know that run-tests pr
