Hello.
> Please don't misinterpret my comments as saying you're wasting time.
> By all means, keep working on this. `tabify` and functions like it
> could be useful to others, I just don't know yet.
I see.
> If you can demonstrate an improvement to clojure.repl by adding these
> functions, then
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:55 PM, OGINO Masanori wrote:
> There are many negative votes for the proposal and the main doubt is
> "do you need to make them in closure.string?"
Hi Ogino,
Please don't misinterpret my comments as saying you're wasting time.
By all means, keep working on this. `tabify`
Hello. Thank you for sparing your time for my proposal.
There are many negative votes for the proposal and the main doubt is
"do you need to make them in closure.string?"
My opinion is, "perhaps I don't but I'm unsure until reading your replies".
At first I wrote some codes to improve clojure.r
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> Are you concerned that there are differences in regex implementations between
> host platforms?
Slightly.
> Or are you hoping that someone develops a portable-between-Clojure-hosts
> regex implementation and adds that to clojure.string?
On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> Stuart Halloway wrote:
>> Whatever we do let's make sure we think about how to make it available in
>> all Clojure dialects.
>
> Yes. When it comes to adding stuff to clojure.string, I'd like to focus
> less on adding single-purpose functions l
Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Whatever we do let's make sure we think about how to make it available in
> all Clojure dialects.
Yes. When it comes to adding stuff to clojure.string, I'd like to focus
less on adding single-purpose functions like dasherize and more on
making sure that it's possible to *w
+1
On Jun 8, 2012 6:54 PM, "Stuart Halloway" wrote:
> Whatever we do let's make sure we think about how to make it available in
> all Clojure dialects.
>
> Stu
>
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jay Fields wrote:
>
> I wouldn't mind seeing more in clojure.string. e.g. daserize, underscore,
> pascal-
Whatever we do let's make sure we think about how to make it available in all
Clojure dialects.
Stu
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jay Fields wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't mind seeing more in clojure.string. e.g. daserize, underscore,
>> pascal-case, camel-case
>
> +1
>
>
> -
> Brian Marick, Ar
On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jay Fields wrote:
> I wouldn't mind seeing more in clojure.string. e.g. daserize, underscore,
> pascal-case, camel-case
+1
-
Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador
Contract programming in Ruby and Clojure
Occasional consulting on Agile
www.exampler.com, www.twitter.c
I wouldn't mind seeing more in clojure.string. e.g. daserize, underscore,
pascal-case, camel-case
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> Seems like a fairly specialized function. No harm in including it where
> it's needed, but does it need to go in clojure.string?
> -S
>
> --
>
Seems like a fairly specialized function. No harm in including it where
it's needed, but does it need to go in clojure.string?
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
What I mean in "they are not used anytime" is "they are _not always_
used."... I'm sorry.
--
OGINO Masanori
http://twitter.com/omasanori
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
No
12 matches
Mail list logo
