Re: [ANN] projars.com

2013-11-29 Thread Stanislav Yurin
Hi Joshua, Your answer is very much appreciated. My hypothesis right now is that highly successful /open source/ projects, already having profit or not, can usually take care of themselves. As well as hardly any established software company needs a broker. But examples on everyone's lips are ve

Re: [ANN] projars.com

2013-11-29 Thread John Wiseman
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Bastien wrote: > > I'm working on a website where people will be able to ask donations > more easily for their FLOSS achievements and future projects, I'd love > to see both directions (more commercial options and more crowdfunded > FLOSS libraries) encouraged at

Re: [ANN] projars.com

2013-11-28 Thread Joshua Ballanco
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 at 12:10, Stanislav Yurin wrote: > Hello, Clojure community. > > I have been following the Clojure path for nearly two years now, and have > really great pleasure > using it in my personal and job projects, watching the community delivering a > lot of great things

Re: [ANN] projars.com

2013-11-28 Thread Bastien
Hi Stanislav, just to clarify my position: I'm fine with diversity, and I don't expect any FLOSS clojure project to be swallowed. I just wanted to mention my hope of more donation-supported libraries. But that's a different issue and I don't want to hijack this thread (more than I already did...

Re: [ANN] projars.com

2013-11-28 Thread Stanislav Yurin
Hi, Thanks Bastien, Josh, I think we have yet to find an example of such kind of "swallowing", if any exists. On contrary, we even have plenty of examples when commercial projects turned FOSS, not talking about peaceful coexistence of openness and alternative licensing schemes. And it is often

Re: [ANN] projars.com

2013-11-28 Thread Josh Kamau
"as long as it does not "swallow" some of the free software code out there." I have the same fears. Josh On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Stanislav, > > Stanislav Yurin writes: > > > In short, on top of every open greatness, it is good to have > > options. > > Indeed. > >

Re: [ANN] projars.com

2013-11-28 Thread Bastien
Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Yurin writes: > In short, on top of every open greatness, it is good to have > options. Indeed. > The last thing I am willing to do is to build something no one needs, > so I have decided to evaluate an idea. > The idea is simple: introducing the commercial option to t