Re: [ANN] oauth-clj

2013-02-05 Thread Leonardo Borges
Thanks for the answer Roman! In the end I went with Matt's lib purely based on the number of stars and forks - so far so good. Cheers, Leonardo Borges www.leonardoborges.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:25 AM, r0man wrote: > When I started this library I wanted something that was based on > clj-ht

Re: [ANN] oauth-clj

2013-02-05 Thread r0man
When I started this library I wanted something that was based on clj-http and the concept of middleware. At that time Matt's library was not based on clj-http yet. But this has changed ... On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 6:37:13 AM UTC+1, Leonardo Borges wrote: > > Nobody ever replied to this and I'm

Re: [ANN] oauth-clj

2013-02-04 Thread Leonardo Borges
Nobody ever replied to this and I'm now wondering the same. Any opinions one way or the other? On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:08:44 PM UTC+11, Dave Sann wrote: > > Hi r0man, > > I am curious as to similarities/differences of your library to: > https://github.com/mattrepl/clj-oauth > > Dave > --

Re: [ANN] oauth-clj

2012-01-23 Thread Dave Sann
Hi r0man, I am curious as to similarities/differences of your library to: https://github.com/mattrepl/clj-oauth Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from