Re: [ANN] garden-watch

Lol, fair enough :) On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Joel Holdbrooks wrote: > Clojure. > > On Feb 5, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Timothy Washington wrote: > > Ok, that's fine. Definitely good to have both ways to tackle the problem. > But I'm curious. What do you feel is being given up by watching garden

Re: [ANN] garden-watch

Clojure. On Feb 5, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Timothy Washington wrote: > Ok, that's fine. Definitely good to have both ways to tackle the problem. But > I'm curious. What do you feel is being given up by watching garden files? > > > Thanks > > Tim Washington > Interruptsoftware.com > > > On We

Re: [ANN] garden-watch

Ok, that's fine. Definitely good to have both ways to tackle the problem. But I'm curious. What do you feel is being given up by watching garden files? Thanks Tim Washington Interruptsoftware.com On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Joel Holdbrooks wrote: > The idea

Re: [ANN] garden-watch

The idea to watch edn or garden files was a consideration of lein-garden but decided against it because, personally, I felt it was giving up a lot. However, some folks may prefer this approach and, hopefully, it suits them just as well. On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:45:43 AM UTC-8, frye wrot

Re: [ANN] garden-watch

Hey Dave, Thanks for that heads up. I originally wanted auto-compiling for *HAML* and *SCSS*. But then thought why, when I could just use edn with *Hiccup* and *Garden*. Now, a lein-hiccup, or some auto compile tool doesn't exist to my knowledge. So *i)* I had to do that work anyways. Then I spent

Re: [ANN] garden-watch

FYI, I think lein garden does this already. is there a particular difference? On Wednesday, 5 February 2014 13:03:55 UTC+11, frye wrote: > > *garden-watch* is very similar > to hiccup-watch (previous > ann