Great news!
Looking forward to adding the support for the clojure.test protocol.
CIDER's users will really appreciate it!
On 6 October 2016 at 21:36, Colin Yates wrote:
> Thanks Sean.
>
> On 6 October 2016 at 19:03, Sean Corfield wrote:
> >> is there a 'benefits over clojure.test' blog anywher
Thanks Sean.
On 6 October 2016 at 19:03, Sean Corfield wrote:
>> is there a 'benefits over clojure.test' blog anywhere?
>
> Not that I’m aware of. I added a GH issue against the website content for
> that. Jay wrote a series of blog posts about Expectations back in 2011 that
> included the just
> is there a 'benefits over clojure.test' blog anywhere?
Not that I’m aware of. I added a GH issue against the website content for that.
Jay wrote a series of blog posts about Expectations back in 2011 that included
the justification for it:
http://blog.jayfields.com/2011/11/clojure-expectation
Thanks Sean. I did have a look at that a whilst ago (when I was
considering migrating to core clojure.test from midge). I think I 'get
it', but is there a 'benefits over clojure.test' blog anywhere?
I wonder if it is the benefits are more subjective - I personally like
the names I give to tests et
