Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-31 Thread Alex Miller
Sounds right to me. On Monday, March 31, 2014 5:40:09 PM UTC-5, Stuart Sierra wrote: > > Yes, during the upgrade to the new Nexus release plugin > (required by Sonatype OSS) we forgot to include the > "distribution" profile, which builds the ZIP, in the Hudson > configuration for Clojure. > > I've

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-31 Thread Stuart Sierra
Yes, during the upgrade to the new Nexus release plugin (required by Sonatype OSS) we forgot to include the "distribution" profile, which builds the ZIP, in the Hudson configuration for Clojure. I've updated the Hudson configuration, so future releases should get a ZIP. I will manually build a ZI

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-31 Thread David Nolen
Thanks! On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > Oof, it's been ages since I looked at that stuff. I'll take a look. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.co

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-31 Thread Stuart Sierra
Oof, it's been ages since I looked at that stuff. I'll take a look. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with y

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-28 Thread Alex Miller
I noticed that but am unclear how that zip file got created in the past. Might need to page Dr. Stuart "Maven" Sierra. Perhaps its due to changing the Nexus staging/release process? On Thursday, March 27, 2014 7:58:12 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote: > > It looks like the zip file that usually incl

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-28 Thread Alex Miller
Looks like the pom.xml should create that with "mvn -Pdistribution package". Perhaps we accidentally lost that profile during the Nexus change. On Friday, March 28, 2014 7:52:21 AM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > I noticed that but am unclear how that zip file got created in the past. > Might ne

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-27 Thread David Nolen
It looks like the zip file that usually included with the releases is missing? http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.5.1/ vs. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.6.0/ Thanks, David On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Alex Miller wrote: > We are pleased to announce

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-25 Thread Mikera
Congrats everyone, and thanks for all the hard work Alex in particular! Looking forward to getting this out into production today On Tuesday, 25 March 2014 22:00:17 UTC+8, Alex Miller wrote: > > We are pleased to announce the release of Clojure 1.6. > > Getting Clojure: > > Web:

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-25 Thread Jochen Schmitt
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:00:17AM -0700, Alex Miller wrote: > We are pleased to announce the release of Clojure 1.6. I will only inform you, that this release should be available on Fedora Rawhide in the next days. The build was completed sucessfully on the build server. Regarding to our update

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-25 Thread Andrey Antukh
Very great job! Thanks! 2014-03-25 15:16 GMT+01:00 Aaron Cohen : > Great job! > > Sorry I didn't catch this in the RC, but the release notes state that: > >- CLJ-1099 If non-seq >passed where seq is needed, error message now is an ExceptionI

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-25 Thread Fergal Byrne
Well done and thanks to all concerned! Switched over to 1.6.0 without a hiccup. Using datomic-free, quil, adi, lein-midje-doc, clj-time, and a few others. All tests are passing, so looking great! Regards, Fergal Byrne On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > Yes, that fix was rev

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-25 Thread Alex Miller
Yes, that fix was reverted - we did not get a chance to fix in the release notes but I will do so for the future record. On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 7:16:32 AM UTC-7, Aaron Cohen wrote: > > Great job! > > Sorry I didn't catch this in the RC, but the release notes state that: > >- CLJ-1099

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-25 Thread Aaron Cohen
Great job! Sorry I didn't catch this in the RC, but the release notes state that: - CLJ-1099 If non-seq passed where seq is needed, error message now is an ExceptionInfo with the instance value, retrievable via ex-data. I think that change w

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.6

2014-03-25 Thread Paul deGrandis
Awesome work everyone! Thanks! Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscrib