On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:48 PM, James Reeves wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 10:29 pm, Cosmin Stejerean wrote:
> > Can you help me understand the difference between this and use (or :use
> in
> > ns)?
>
> use is internal to the current namespace. You can use other namespaces
> without their publics being
On Jan 26, 10:29 pm, Cosmin Stejerean wrote:
> Can you help me understand the difference between this and use (or :use in
> ns)?
use is internal to the current namespace. You can use other namespaces
without their publics being added to the current namespace. So:
=> (ns a)
=> (def x 10)
=> (ns
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:20 PM, James Reeves wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've recently found myself having to choose between dividing
> functionality between many specific namespaces, or having a few very
> generic namespaces. In theory, being specific is the better choice, as
> it allows users to m
