Works. amazing.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> Actually, so this can't be used on structs for fns?
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Stuart Sierra <
> the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 19, 1:15 pm, David Nolen wrote:
>> > I've noticed this as well. It
Actually, so this can't be used on structs for fns?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 1:15 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> > I've noticed this as well. It seems to me that this prevents you from
> > dynamically defining a var (like in a macro) that has metadata attac
Wow, nice!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 1:15 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> > I've noticed this as well. It seems to me that this prevents you from
> > dynamically defining a var (like in a macro) that has metadata attached
> to
> > it or it's arguments (if it's
On Jan 19, 1:15 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> I've noticed this as well. It seems to me that this prevents you from
> dynamically defining a var (like in a macro) that has metadata attached to
> it or it's arguments (if it's a function).
You can also use the new alter-meta! function, which works o
Hi,
Am 19.01.2009 um 19:15 schrieb David Nolen:
I've noticed this as well. It seems to me that this prevents you
from dynamically defining a var (like in a macro) that has metadata
attached to it or it's arguments (if it's a function). Is there no
way around how the reader works? Can the
