On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome
> your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved. I'm not
> looking (or likely authorized :) to make any drastic changes but if
> there are things
Kind of late, but I hope you can still consider this. The "latest
news" section on the homepage should be marked with corresponding date
against each news entry: http://clojure.org/
Regards,
Shantanu
On Nov 28, 10:08 am, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> Jason,
>
> ActuallyAlexwas a little off the mark her
Jason,
Actually Alex was a little off the mark here. The problem was in the
templates that generate the autodoc so they were pretty easy to fix
for all versions.
The github links are now fixed and I expect to modify the assembla
pointers to the new confluence/jira stuff tonight or tomorrow.
Plea
I think annotations support was added in 1.2. Could we add some
information to the Java Interop section regarding this?
https://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/d2128e1505c0c117?pli=1
Allen
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing a bit of
The main page link to API is a little confusing/annoying.
I expect it to go here: http://clojure.org/api
( I expect this because doing a google search on "clojure api" brings
it up)
However the main page link to API goes directly to here:
http://clojure.github.com/clojure/
It's kind of annoying/
Done.
On Nov 15, 12:21 pm, Rick Moynihan wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I have one more Clojure Group for you:
>
> The Manchester (UK) Clojure Dojo
>
> http://manchester.clojuredojo.com/
>
> I'm currently in the process of organising our next meeting, but a
> link on the clojure.org website would be appre
Hi Alex,
I have one more Clojure Group for you:
The Manchester (UK) Clojure Dojo
http://manchester.clojuredojo.com/
I'm currently in the process of organising our next meeting, but a
link on the clojure.org website would be appreciated.
R.
On 31 October 2010 02:38, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi al
I also noticed that clojure.org/agents does not mention the *agent* var...
// raek
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please b
I think there should be a link from the Namespaces page to the Libs
page. Hopefully, this will make it easier for people to find examples
on how to use the ns form.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to c
Michael: thanks for those tips. I can't do anything about those but I
will raise it...
ka: you can find that kind of stuff now on the Clojure confluence
pages:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Home
On Nov 2, 10:43 pm, ka wrote:
> Hi Alex, Can we have a section: Clojure - What's next? Dish
Hi Alex, Can we have a section: Clojure - What's next? Dishes out
some details & links for the next versions and ideas.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from
Jason - that's a good catch but out of my purview. Also, those are
autodocs generated from the (released and thus immutable :) 1.2
afaik.
On Nov 2, 4:12 pm, Jason Wolfe wrote:
> Not sure if you count this as off limits as part of the API page, but
> its first line points to a stale "official so
This is perhaps a little off topic, but related.
I see that http://code.google.com/p/clojure/ has been updated
recently, but still references Assembla.
These could do with an update too:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clojure/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clojure-contrib/
--
Michael Wood
- Jeff, Rick, Kyle - I've added your groups
- added other groups mentioned on #clojure and twitter
- cheat sheet has been updated to 1.2
- new "tips on starting a user group" page added -
http://clojure.org/start_group
(linked from the community page)
- fixed broken links on contributing page
- fi
Not sure if you count this as off limits as part of the API page, but
its first line points to a stale "official source code for clojure"
-- should be updated to the new github repo.
-Jason
On Oct 30, 7:38 pm, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup onhttp://clojure.organ
>> I'm particularly interested in:
>> - new user groups or suggestions for the community page
>> - stuff that is just wrong or out of date
Philly Clojure Language Club:
http://groups.google.com/group/phl-clojure-language-club
Kyle
--
Twitter: @kyleburton
Blog: http://asymmetrical-view.com/
Fun:
Los Angeles Clojure Users Group
http://clj-la.org/
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome
> your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved. I'm not
> looking (or likely authorized :) to
> > I'm particularly interested in:
> > - new user groups or suggestions for the community page
Montreal Clojure group: http://www.bonjure.org/
Thank you kindly
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo
Sam
- I've added the Cambridge Clojurians
Phil
- I've added Seajure
- I've added a link from the contributing page to the patches page -
great suggestion!
- On libraries -> noted, I am building a list of stuff to discuss
further with the core team
Sean
- no, there is no rationale for the ordering
Thanks, this is neat! My input is inline.
On Oct 31, 7:38 am, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup onhttp://clojure.organd I'd welcome
> your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved. I'm not
> looking (or likely authorized :) to make any drastic changes
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Some recent changes I've already made:
> - switched all of the old richhickey github references to clojure
Yay!
> I'm particularly interested in:
> - new user groups or suggestions for the community page
I'm curious - is there any rationale
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alex Miller wrote:
> I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome
> your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved. I'm not
> looking (or likely authorized :) to make any drastic changes but if
> there are things that you have
Hi Alex,
thanks for doing this - it's much appreciated.
w.r.t. user groups for the community page, you might want to mention the
Cambridge Clojurians http://www.meetup.com/Cambridge-Clojurians/
Sam
---
http://sam.aaron.name
On 31 Oct 2010, at 2.38 am, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm do
Hi all,
I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome
your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved. I'm not
looking (or likely authorized :) to make any drastic changes but if
there are things that you have run into, please drop a line here or in
email to al
24 matches
Mail list logo
