On Apr 1, 11:41 am, Chanwoo Yoo wrote:
> Hello. Yesterday, I talked with a representative of a publisher about
> a translation of Lisp books. There are books about Ruby, Lua, Erlang,
> and Groovy in South Korea, but there is no book about Lisp except
> SICP. So he is considering printing the fi
I have used Java and Jsp for many years as the platform for my
business offerings. All new development is now being done in Clojure -
I am comfortable (nay, delighted) with it's stability and viability.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:51:49 Jo
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:51:49 Joshua Fox wrote:
> > 3. Clojure can use Java libraries. Common Lisp can use C/C++
> > libraries. Is it possible to say Clojure has strong points to Common
> > Lisp in the power of libraries?
>
> Accessing Java from Clojure is easier & more transparent than acce
> 3. Clojure can use Java libraries. Common Lisp can use C/C++
> libraries. Is it possible to say Clojure has strong points to Common
> Lisp in the power of libraries?
Accessing Java from Clojure is easier & more transparent than accessing C
from Common Lisp.
Joshua
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:41 PM
Hello. Yesterday, I talked with a representative of a publisher about
a translation of Lisp books. There are books about Ruby, Lua, Erlang,
and Groovy in South Korea, but there is no book about Lisp except
SICP. So he is considering printing the first Lisp book in South
Korea. We talked about 'Pro
I can't give you any numbers on #2, but I have used both languages and there
is no comparison. Groovy is freakishly slow. Clojure is relatively zippy.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Chanwoo Yoo wrote:
>
> Hello. Yesterday, I talked with a representative of a publisher about
> a translation o
