Some numbers:
Clojure:
]% time java -server -cp clj-starcraft.jar:$HOME/src/clojure/
clojure.jar clojure.main dump.clj misc/replays/*.rep
1047
"Elapsed time: 159605.6084 msecs"
java -server -cp clj-starcraft.jar:$HOME/src/clojure/clojure.jar
clojure.main 163.84s user 1.11s system 102% cpu 2:41.
Java 1.6.0_07 for Hardy vs Java 1.6.0_10 for Ibex.
However, with this newer package, the Java program is now more than
13x faster than my Clojure program. Looks like I got a lot of work
ahead of me.
Vincent.
On Mar 16, 9:31 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim
wrote:
> Are they both Java 6? I know it fixe
Are they both Java 6? I know it fixed a lot of performance issue over 5.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Vincent Foley wrote:
>
> I found that the problem is caused by the version of Sun's JVM on
> Ubunty Hardy Heron. On my Ibex machine at home, the first two lines
> (Object.wait and Referenc
I found that the problem is caused by the version of Sun's JVM on
Ubunty Hardy Heron. On my Ibex machine at home, the first two lines
(Object.wait and ReferenceQueue.remove) are not even there and the
costliest method if AtomicInteger.get.
Vincent.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
I was trying to make an application go faster today when I found out
that a Java program that does pretty much the same task was 8 times
faster. I used the -Xrunhprof:cpu=times profiling flag to know where
I should look, and the results are a little puzzling:
CPU TIME (ms) BEGIN (total = 3334005
