Thanks for the response and giving me some understanding in the thought
process behind this!
I'm happy that Spec is still offering support for unqualifed keys to fit
use-cases like this in records. I do think it would be cool to see
something come out of the "implicit" namespace already associ
This is a good question and one we've discussed a bit. You can use the
existing s/keys with :req-un and :opt-un to spec the (unqualified) keys of
a record - there's an example of this in the guide at
http://clojure.org/guides/spec. So that's the short-term current answer.
However, there are pot
I know that Spec and the changes coming to Clojure 1.9 I see that namespace
qualified keys have gained some focus. I understand the motivations for this
and support it.
The one barrier that is coming up for me is in the use of Clojure records (and
perhaps deftype types too). We use records fai
