I have found that I can get a bit nicer stacktraces by installing
clj-stacktrace.
Should probably do my duty and do a documentation pullrequest to nrepl.el
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:10 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> Better tracebacks have been available in Clojure since 1.3:
>
> user=> (requi
Better tracebacks have been available in Clojure since 1.3:
user=> (require '[clojure.repl :as r])
user=> (r/pst *e)
e* is the last exception.
It's up to the tools to support it. That said allowing customized
tracebacks for tools could be improved - but no one's ever submitted any
serious patche
I haven't looked at the technical side of your mail, but improvements to
stacktraces are highly appreciated
Den 19 jan 2013 20:57 skrev :
> Hi all
>
> I've been thinking about how long tracebacks get for pure Clojure errors,
> and it would be really nice if we could hide the Java traceback from th
Hi all
I've been thinking about how long tracebacks get for pure Clojure errors,
and it would be really nice if we could hide the Java traceback from the
compiler when it's not relevant. When there's no Java interop, it's not
useful. I can't see any case where we want the tracebacks from the co
