Hi Meikel,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> On 19 Dez., 02:10, bc wrote:
>> For clojure-contrib, it would make sense to create a matching tarball
>> whenever a Clojure release occurs. For the other 3, it would be
>> necessary for someone to test and save off a copy o
> I would propose, that the files are hosted where ever
> they are hosted now with suitable labels with which
> Clojure version they work. This works out of the box
> with the least amount of trouble.
>
> Meikel
In contrast to the monolithic GG Code repo or C*AN or git/hg/bzr.*hubs
I find that th
Hi,
On 19 Dez., 02:10, bc wrote:
> For clojure-contrib, it would make sense to create a matching tarball
> whenever a Clojure release occurs. For the other 3, it would be
> necessary for someone to test and save off a copy of the libraries
> somewhere (that by itself would make getting started
On Dec 18, 5:46 am, Rich Hickey wrote:
> I've cut a new release, 20081217, which is available from Google Code:
>
> http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_20081217.zip
Reading noob comments on this list, I suspect many people downloaded
the September Clojure tarball and tried (with mixed su
