On Oct 14, 6:35 pm, "Matthew D. Swank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Oct 14, 4:48 pm, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Tuesday 14 October 2008 14:17, Matthew D. Swank wrote:
>
> > > Just a data-point:
> > > OS: Windows-XP
> > > CPU: Pentium-IV 2.8 Ghz
> > > Mem: 504 MB
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 16:35, Matthew D. Swank wrote:
> On Oct 14, 4:48 pm, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 October 2008 14:17, Matthew D. Swank wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Startup time of swank-clojure rev. 1064: 6 s.
> > > Startup time of swank-clojure rev. 106
On Oct 14, 4:48 pm, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 14:17, Matthew D. Swank wrote:
>
> > Just a data-point:
> > OS: Windows-XP
> > CPU: Pentium-IV 2.8 Ghz
> > Mem: 504 MB
>
> > JDK:1.6u10rc
>
> > Startup time of swank-clojure rev. 1064: 6 s.
> > Startup t
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 14:17, Matthew D. Swank wrote:
> Just a data-point:
> OS: Windows-XP
> CPU: Pentium-IV 2.8 Ghz
> Mem: 504 MB
>
> JDK:1.6u10rc
>
> Startup time of swank-clojure rev. 1064: 6 s.
> Startup time of swank-clojure rev. 1068: 120 s!
You managed to slow it down by a factor of 2
Just a data-point:
OS: Windows-XP
CPU: Pentium-IV 2.8 Ghz
Mem: 504 MB
JDK:1.6u10rc
Startup time of swank-clojure rev. 1064: 6 s.
Startup time of swank-clojure rev. 1068: 120 s!
When I get home, I can see if the difference is as dramatic in Linux
x68_64 and OS-X PPC32.
--~--~-~--~~--