+1
This would be awesome for contrib, too.
On Oct 21, 2:03 am, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> On Oct 21, 4:27 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
> > I wonder if we got more manpower involved in that process if it would
> > mean less work for Rich and the committer team when they are ready to
> > apply patc
On Oct 21, 4:27 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> I wonder if we got more manpower involved in that process if it would
> mean less work for Rich and the committer team when they are ready to
> apply patches since it weeds out the patches that are clearly not
> ready. Some projects I've worked on wil
So it's great to see new ideas popping up like protocols and datatypes,
but I've noticed that the list of patches ready to apply to Clojure gets
pretty long and doesn't seem to move that fast. I don't mean to
complain; I'd much rather have Rich and co. working on exciting new
features than spendi
